Compared with Brightly Asset Essentials
Where each of us is ahead
Every claim below was read on their own pages, and each carries the date it was read. Nothing here comes from a review site.
| What is being compared | Sitekeep | Brightly Asset Essentials |
|---|---|---|
| Published pricingread on their site, 25 Aug 2026 | Three plans, on the site; 30 days of the top plan to start | No figure published — “Request a demo” |
| Getting startedread on their site, 25 Aug 2026 | Self-serve, same session | A demo, then a guided implementation |
| Reporting without an accountread on their site, 25 Aug 2026 | Yes, and the tracking link needs no account either | Anonymous requests where enabled; an account to follow one |
| Bringing your list inread on their site, 25 Aug 2026 | A spreadsheet you import yourself, whenever you like | At implementation; afterwards on Enterprise or with consulting |
| Offline mobile appread on their site, 25 Aug 2026 | No | Yes for work orders — not for new requests |
| Breadthread on their site, 25 Aug 2026 | The maintenance loop, and rooms | Parts, purchasing and ERP sync; capital planning is a separate product |
When they are the better choice
Their mobile app works with no signal and ours does not exist. They cover parts, purchasing and purchase-order sync with a finance system, and a companion product for capital planning — none of which we have built. Their implementation service migrates your existing data for you. And they have been doing this for years at a scale we have not been tested at, with people to ring when it goes wrong.
Their pages have since moved to a new address. This page keeps the product’s name, which is what a reader searches for.