Compared with UpKeep
Where each of us is ahead
Every claim below was read on their own pages, and each carries the date it was read. Nothing here comes from a review site.
| What is being compared | Sitekeep | UpKeep |
|---|---|---|
| Reporting without an accountread on their site, 2 Sept 2026 | Yes, on every plan, and the tracking link needs no account | Yes, on the two plans priced on request; an emailed sign-in link to follow one |
| Published pricingread on their site, 2 Sept 2026 | Three plans on the site, one of them free; 30 days of the top plan to start | Two plans priced per user per month; two more on request |
| Getting startedread on their site, 2 Sept 2026 | Self-serve, same session | Self-serve trial; implementation is a paid add-on |
| Bringing your list inread on their site, 2 Sept 2026 | A spreadsheet you import yourself, whenever you like | Templates for nine kinds of record; their pricing table and their help pages disagree on whether the cheapest plan gets it |
| Offline mobile appread on their site, 2 Sept 2026 | No | Yes, on Professional and Enterprise, for a handful of cached jobs |
| Breadthread on their site, 2 Sept 2026 | The maintenance loop, and rooms | Parts and meters from Premium; purchase orders, integrations and the API on Enterprise |
When they are the better choice
Their mobile app works with no signal on the plans that include it, and ours does not exist. They cover parts, meters, purchase orders and connectors to SAP, Oracle and NetSuite, none of which we have built. Their paid implementation packages migrate your data for you. And they have years and thousands of customers at a scale we have not been tested at.